Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Combined Effects of Masking and Distance on Aerosol Exposure Potential

      Abstract

      Objective

      To quantify the efficacy of masking and “social distancing” on the transmission of airborne particles from a phantom aerosol source (simulating an infected individual) to a nearby target (simulating a healthy bystander) in a well-controlled setting.

      Methods

      An aerosol was created using monodisperse polystyrene latex beads in place of infectious respiratory secretions. Detection was by aerodynamic particle spectrometry. Both reusable cloth masks and disposable paper masks were studied. Transmission was simulated indoors during a 3-minute interval to eliminate the effect of variable ventilation rate on aerosol exposure. The study commenced on September 16, 2020, and concluded on December 15, 2020.

      Results

      Compared with a baseline of 1-foot separation with no masks employed, particle count was reduced by 84% at 3 feet of separation and 97% at 6 feet. A modest decrease in particle count was observed when only the receiver was masked. The most substantial exposure reduction occurred when the aerosol source was masked (or both parties were masked). When both the source and target were masked, particle count was reduced by more than 99.5% of baseline, regardless of separation distance or which type of mask was employed.

      Conclusion

      These results support the principle of layered protection to mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, and other respiratory viruses and emphasize the importance of controlling the spread of aerosol at its source. The combination of masking and distancing reduced the exposure to exhaled particulates more than any individual measure. Combined measures remain the most effective way to combat the spread of respiratory infection.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      APS (aerodynamic particle sizer), COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), HCP (health care personnel), PSL (polystyrene latex), SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), SLPM (standard liter per minute)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Prather K.A.
        • Wang C.C.
        • Schooley R.T.
        Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
        Science. 2020; 368: 1422-1424
        • Morawska L.
        • Milton D.K.
        It is time to address airborne transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
        Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71: 2311-2313
        • Xie X.
        • Li Y.
        • Chwang A.T.Y.
        • Ho P.L.
        • Seto W.H.
        How far droplets can move in indoor environments—revisiting the Wells evaporation–falling curve.
        Indoor Air. 2007; 17: 211-225
        • Ji Y.
        • Qian H.
        • Ye J.
        • Zheng X.
        The impact of ambient humidity on the evaporation and dispersion of exhaled breathing droplets: a numerical investigation.
        J Aerosol Sci. 2018; 115: 164-172
        • Yu I.T.S.
        • Li Y.
        • Wong T.W.
        • et al.
        Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1731-1739
        • Yeh H.C.
        • Liu B.Y.H.
        Aerosol filtration by fibrous filters—I. Theoretical.
        J Aerosol Sci. 1974; 5: 191-204
        • Lee K.W.
        • Liu B.Y.H.
        Theoretical study of aerosol filtration by fibrous filters.
        Aerosol Sci Technol. 1982; 1: 147-161
        • Bundgaard H.
        • Bundgaard J.S.
        • Raaschou-Pedersen D.E.T.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers.
        Ann Intern Med. 2021; 174: 335-343
        • Cowling B.J.
        • Zhou Y.
        • Ip D.K.M.
        • Leung G.M.
        • Aiello A.E.
        Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review.
        Epidemiol Infect. 2010; 138: 449-456
        • Bin-Reza F.
        • Lopez Chavarrias V.
        • Nicoll A.
        • Chamberland M.E.
        The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.
        Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012; 6: 257-267
        • Grinshpun S.A.
        • Haruta H.
        • Eninger R.M.
        • Reponen T.
        • McKay R.T.
        • Lee S.A.
        Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration.
        J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009; 6: 593-603
        • Oberg T.
        • Brosseau L.M.
        Surgical mask filter and fit performance.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 276-282
        • Davies A.
        • Thompson K.A.
        • Giri K.
        • Kafatos G.
        • Walker J.
        • Bennett A.
        Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?.
        Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013; 7: 413-418
        • Johnson D.F.
        • Druce J.D.
        • Birch C.
        • Grayson M.L.
        A quantitative assessment of the efficacy of surgical and N95 masks to filter influenza virus in patients with acute influenza infection.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49: 275-277
        • Lai A.C.K.
        • Poon C.K.M.
        • Cheung A.C.T.
        Effectiveness of facemasks to reduce exposure hazards for airborne infections among general populations.
        J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9: 938-948
        • Asadi S.
        • Wexler A.S.
        • Cappa C.D.
        • Barreda S.
        • Bouvier N.M.
        • Ristenpart W.D.
        Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness.
        Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 2348
        • Johnson G.R.
        • Morawska L.
        • Ristovski Z.D.
        • et al.
        Modality of human expired aerosol size distributions.
        J Aerosol Sci. 2011; 42: 839-851
        • Morawska L.
        • Johnson G.R.
        • Ristovski Z.D.
        • et al.
        Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities.
        J Aerosol Sci. 2009; 40: 256-269
        • Liu Y.
        • Ning Z.
        • Chen Y.
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals.
        Nature. 2020; 582: 557-560
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Lin C.H.
        • Chen Q.
        Characterizing exhaled airflow from breathing and talking.
        Indoor Air. 2010; 20: 31-39
        • Volckens J.
        • Peters T.M.
        Counting and particle transmission efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer.
        J Aerosol Sci. 2005; 36: 1400-1408
        • Rogak S.N.
        • Sipkens T.A.
        • Guan M.
        • Nikookar H.
        • Vargas Figueroa D.
        • Wang J.
        Properties of materials considered for improvised masks.
        Aerosol Sci Technol. 2021; 55: 398-413
        • Kähler C.J.
        • Hain R.
        Fundamental protective mechanisms of face masks against droplet infections.
        J Aerosol Sci. 2020; 148: 105617
        • Leffler C.T.
        • Ing E.
        • Lykins J.D.
        • Hogan M.C.
        • McKeown C.A.
        • Grzybowski A.
        Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks.
        Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020; 103: 2400-2411
        • Lyu W.
        • Wehby G.L.
        Community use of face masks and COVID-19: evidence from a natural experiment of state mandates in the US.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2020; 39: 1419-1425
        • Chan J.F.
        • Yuan S.
        • Zhang A.J.
        • et al.
        Surgical mask partition reduces the risk of noncontact transmission in a golden Syrian hamster model for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
        Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71: 2139-2149
        • Konda A.
        • Prakash A.
        • Moss G.A.
        • Schmoldt M.
        • Grant G.D.
        • Guha S.
        Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks.
        ACS Nano. 2020; 14: 6339-6347
        • Fischer E.P.
        • Fischer M.C.
        • Grass D.
        • Henrion I.
        • Warren W.S.
        • Westman E.
        Low-cost measurement of face mask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech.
        Sci Adv. 2020; 6: eabd3083
        • Gandhi M.
        • Beyrer C.
        • Goosby E.
        Masks do more than protect others during COVID-19: reducing the inoculum of SARS-CoV-2 to protect the wearer.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35: 3063-3066

      Linked Article

      • Sex, Cells, and Asthma
        Mayo Clinic ProceedingsVol. 96Issue 7
        • Preview
          There are marked sex differences in asthma prevalence and severity. Sex hormones play a central role in these sex biases and directly interact with multiple key cells involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Here we review the known effects of estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone on airway epithelial cells, airway smooth muscle cells, the mononuclear phagocyte system, innate lymphoid cells, eosinophils, mast cells, T cells, and B cells, all in the context of asthma. Furthermore, we explore unresolved clinical questions, such as the role of sex hormones in the link between asthma and obesity.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF