Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Differences in Code Status and End-of-Life Decision Making in Patients With Limited English Proficiency in the Intensive Care Unit

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine whether code status, advance directives, and decisions to limit life support were different for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) as compared with patients whose primary language was English.

      Patients and Methods

      We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to 7 ICUs in a single tertiary academic medical center from May 31, 2011, through June 1, 2014.

      Results

      Of the 27,523 patients admitted to the ICU, 779 (2.8%) had LEP. When adjusted for severity of illness, sex, education level, and insurance status, patients with LEP were less likely to change their code status from full code to do not resuscitate during ICU admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.82; P<.001) and took 3.8 days (95% CI, 1.9-5.6 days; P<.001) longer to change to do not resuscitate. Patients with LEP who died in the ICU were less likely to receive a comfort measures order set (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; P=.03) and took 19.1 days (95% CI, 13.2-25.1 days; P<.001) longer to transition to comfort measures only. Patients with LEP were less likely to have an advance directive (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.18-0.29; P<.001), more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.48; P=.005), and more likely to have restraints used (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.11-1.65; P=.003). The hospital length of stay was 2.7 days longer for patients with LEP. Additional adjustment for religion, race, and age yielded similar results.

      Conclusion

      There are important differences in end-of-life care and decision making for patients with LEP.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation), DNR (do not resuscitate), ICU (intensive care unit), LEP (limited English proficiency), OR (odds ratio)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • US Census Bureau
        American Community Survey, Detailed Languages Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over: 2009-2013.
        (Accessed June 18, 2018.)
      1. Limited English Proficiency. https://www.lep.gov/faqs/faqs.html#One_LEP_FAQ. Accessed June 18, 2018.

        • John-Baptiste A.
        • Naglie G.
        • Tomlinson G.
        • et al.
        The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 221-228
        • Karliner L.S.
        • Kim S.E.
        • Meltzer D.O.
        • Auerbach A.D.
        Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients.
        J Hosp Med. 2010; 5: 276-282
        • Linderoth G.
        • Hallas P.
        • Lippert F.K.
        • et al.
        Challenges in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a study combining closed-circuit television (CCTV) and medical emergency calls.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 96: 317-322
        • Ngo-Metzger Q.
        • Sorkin D.H.
        • Phillips R.S.
        • et al.
        Providing high-quality care for limited English proficient patients: the importance of language concordance and interpreter use.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 324-330
        • Schenker Y.
        • Karter A.J.
        • Schillinger D.
        • et al.
        The impact of limited English proficiency and physician language concordance on reports of clinical interactions among patients with diabetes: the DISTANCE study.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81: 222-228
        • Harmsen J.A.
        • Bernsen R.M.
        • Bruijnzeels M.A.
        • Meeuwesen L.
        Patients' evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers?.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 72: 155-162
        • Cheng E.M.
        • Chen A.
        • Cunningham W.
        Primary language and receipt of recommended health care among Hispanics in the United States.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 283-288
        • Woloshin S.
        • Schwartz L.M.
        • Katz S.J.
        • Welch H.G.
        Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services?.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 472-477
        • Manson A.
        Language concordance as a determinant of patient compliance and emergency room use in patients with asthma.
        Med Care. 1988; 26: 1119-1128
        • Flores G.
        • Abreu M.
        • Olivar M.A.
        • Kastner B.
        Access barriers to health care for Latino children.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152: 1119-1125
        • Kirkman-Liff B.
        • Mondragón D.
        Language of interview: relevance for research of southwest Hispanics.
        Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 1399-1404
        • Ferguson W.J.
        • Candib L.M.
        Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship.
        Fam Med. 2002; 34: 353-361
        • Hampers L.C.
        • Cha S.
        • Gutglass D.J.
        • Binns H.J.
        • Krug S.E.
        Language barriers and resource utilization in a pediatric emergency department.
        Pediatrics. 1999; 103: 1253-1256
        • Silva M.D.
        • Genoff M.
        • Zaballa A.
        • et al.
        Interpreting at the end of life: a systematic review of the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to cancer patients with limited English proficiency.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016; 51: 569-580
        • McGrath P.
        • Vun M.
        • McLeod L.
        Needs and experiences of non-English-speaking hospice patients and families in an English-speaking country.
        Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2001; 18: 305-312
        • Chan A.
        • Woodruff R.K.
        Comparison of palliative care needs of English- and non-English-speaking patients.
        J Palliat Care. 1999; 15: 26-30
        • Thornton J.D.
        • Pham K.
        • Engelberg R.A.
        • Jackson J.C.
        • Curtis J.R.
        Families with limited English proficiency receive less information and support in interpreted intensive care unit family conferences.
        Crit Care Med. 2009; 37: 89-95
        • Norris W.M.
        • Wenrich M.D.
        • Nielsen E.L.
        • Treece P.D.
        • Jackson J.C.
        • Curtis J.R.
        Communication about end-of-life care between language-discordant patients and clinicians: insights from medical interpreters.
        J Palliat Med. 2005; 8: 1016-1024
        • Ngai K.M.
        • Grudzen C.R.
        • Lee R.
        • Tong V.Y.
        • Richardson L.D.
        • Fernandez A.
        The association between limited English proficiency and unplanned emergency department revisit within 72 hours.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 68: 213-221
        • Qureshi M.M.
        • Romesser P.B.
        • Jalisi S.
        • et al.
        The influence of limited English proficiency on outcome in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 97: 276-282
        • Parker M.M.
        • Fernández A.
        • Moffet H.H.
        • Grant R.W.
        • Torreblanca A.
        • Karter A.J.
        Association of patient-physician language concordance and glycemic control for limited–English proficiency Latinos with type 2 diabetes.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 380-387
        • Deyo R.A.
        • Cherkin D.C.
        • Ciol M.A.
        Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 613-619
        • Knaus W.A.
        • Wagner D.P.
        • Draper E.A.
        • et al.
        The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.
        Chest. 1991; 100: 1619-1636
        • Mularski R.A.
        • Curtis J.R.
        • Billings J.A.
        • et al.
        Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup.
        Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: S404-S411
        • Voepel-Lewis T.
        • Zanotti J.
        • Dammeyer J.A.
        • Merkel S.
        Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.
        Am J Crit Care. 2010; 19: 55-61
        • Sessler C.N.
        • Gosnell M.S.
        • Grap M.J.
        • et al.
        The Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166: 1338-1344
        • Ely E.W.
        • Margolin R.
        • Francis J.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).
        Crit Care Med. 2001; 29: 1370-1379
        • Gillick M.R.
        Advance care planning.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 7-8
        • Sudore R.L.
        • Fried T.R.
        Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making.
        Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153: 256-261
        • Silveira M.J.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Langa K.M.
        Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1211-1218
        • Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A.
        • Rietjens J.A.
        • van der Heide A.
        The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review.
        Palliat Med. 2014; 28: 1000-1025
        • Kwak J.
        • Haley W.E.
        Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups.
        Gerontologist. 2005; 45: 634-641
        • Harrison K.L.
        • Adrion E.R.
        • Ritchie C.S.
        • Sudore R.L.
        • Smith A.K.
        Low completion and disparities in advance care planning activities among older Medicare beneficiaries.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 1872-1875
        • Cohen M.J.
        • McCannon J.B.
        • Edgman-Levitan S.
        • Kormos W.A.
        Exploring attitudes toward advance care directives in two diverse settings.
        J Palliat Med. 2010; 13: 1427-1432
        • Born W.
        • Greiner K.A.
        • Sylvia E.
        • Butler J.
        • Ahluwalia J.S.
        Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about end-of-life care among inner-city African Americans and Latinos.
        J Palliat Med. 2004; 7: 247-256
        • Blinderman C.D.
        • Billings J.A.
        Comfort care for patients dying in the hospital.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 2549-2561
        • Clarke E.B.
        • Curtis J.R.
        • Luce J.M.
        • et al.
        Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care End-Of-Life Peer Workgroup Members. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.
        Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 2255-2262
        • Rivadeneyra R.
        • Elderkin-Thompson V.
        • Silver R.C.
        • Waitzkin H.
        Patient centeredness in medical encounters requiring an interpreter.
        Am J Med. 2000; 108: 470-474
        • Wilson M.E.
        • Rhudy L.M.
        • Ballinger B.A.
        • Tescher A.N.
        • Pickering B.W.
        • Gajic O.
        Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: a qualitative study.
        Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39: 1009-1018
        • Gadon M.
        • Balch G.I.
        • Jacobs E.A.
        Caring for patients with limited English proficiency: the perspectives of small group practitioners.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 341-346
        • Cardenas A.
        • Villavicencio L.
        • Pavuluri M.
        Considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation and treatment of children with limited English proficiency.
        Perm J. 2017; 21
        • Volandes A.E.
        • Paasche-Orlow M.
        • Gillick M.R.
        • et al.
        Health literacy not race predicts end-of-life care preferences.
        J Palliat Medi. 2008; 11: 754-762
        • Kutner M.
        • Greenberg E.
        • Jin Y.
        • Paulsen C.
        The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
        US Dept of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC2006 (NCES 2006-2483)
        • Shaw A.
        • Ibrahim S.
        • Reid F.
        • Ussher M.
        • Rowlands G.
        Patients' perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels.
        Patient Educ Counsel. 2009; 75: 114-120
        • Wieland M.L.
        • Tiedje K.
        • Meiers S.J.
        • et al.
        Perspectives on physical activity among immigrants and refugees to a small urban community in Minnesota.
        J Immigr Minor Health. 2015; 17: 263-275
        • Searight H.R.
        • Gafford J.
        Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians.
        Am Fam Physician. 2005; 71: 515-522
        • Jesus J.E.
        • Allen M.B.
        • Michael G.E.
        • et al.
        Preferences for resuscitation and intubation among patients with do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate orders.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88: 658-665