Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Prevalence of Multimorbidity in a Geographically Defined American Population

Patterns by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity
Published:September 10, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.010

      Abstract

      Objective

      To describe the prevalence of multimorbidity involving 20 selected chronic conditions in a geographically defined US population, emphasizing age, sex, and racial/ethnic differences.

      Patients and Methods

      Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project records linkage system, we identified all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, on April 1, 2010, and electronically extracted the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes associated with all health care visits made between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2010 (5-year capture frame). Using these codes, we defined the 20 common chronic conditions recommended by the US Department of Health and Human Services. We counted only persons who received at least 2 codes for a given condition separated by more than 30 days, and we calculated the age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific prevalence of multimorbidity.

      Results

      Of the 138,858 study participants, 52.4% were women (n=72,732) and 38.9% had 1 or more conditions (n=54,012), 22.6% had 2 or more conditions (n=31,444), and 4.9% had 5 or more conditions (n=6853). The prevalence of multimorbidity (≥2 conditions) increased steeply with older age and reached 77.3% at 65 years and older. However, the absolute number of people affected by multimorbidity was higher in those younger than 65 years. Although the prevalence of multimorbidity was similar in men and women overall, the most common dyads and triads of conditions varied by sex. Compared with white persons, the prevalence of multimorbidity was slightly higher in black persons and slightly lower in Asian persons.

      Conclusion

      Multimorbidity is common in the general population; it increases steeply with older age, has different patterns in men and women, and varies by race/ethnicity.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      ARR (cardiac arrhythmia), ART (arthritis), AST (asthma), AUT (autism spectrum disorder), CAD (coronary artery disease), CAN (cancer), CHF (congestive heart failure), CKD (chronic kidney disease), CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), DEM (dementia), DEP (depression), DIA (diabetes), HEP (hepatitis), HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), HTN (hypertension), ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision), LIP (hyperlipidemia), OST (osteoporosis), REP (Rochester Epidemiology Project), STR (stroke), SUB (substance abuse disorders), SZO (schizophrenia)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boyd C.M.
        • Darer J.
        • Boult C.
        • Fried L.P.
        • Boult L.
        • Wu A.W.
        Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 716-724
        • Hughes L.D.
        • McMurdo M.E.T.
        • Guthrie B.
        Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity.
        Age Ageing. 2013; 42: 62-69
        • Goodman R.A.
        • Posner S.F.
        • Huang E.S.
        • Parekh A.K.
        • Koh H.K.
        Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: E66
        • US Department of Health and Human Services
        Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework: Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals With Multiple Chronic Conditions.
        US Dept of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCDecember 2010
        • Salive M.E.
        Multimorbidity in older adults.
        Epidemiol Rev. 2013; 35: 75-83
        • Parekh A.K.
        • Goodman R.A.
        • Gordon C.
        • Koh H.K.
        Managing multiple chronic conditions: a strategic framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life.
        Public Health Rep. 2011; 126: 460-471
        • Wallace R.B.
        • Salive M.E.
        The dimensions of multiple chronic conditions: where do we go from here? a commentary on the Special Issue of Preventing Chronic Disease.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: E59
        • Diederichs C.
        • Berger K.
        • Bartels D.B.
        The measurement of multiple chronic diseases: a systematic review on existing multimorbidity indices.
        J Geronotol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011; 66: 301-311
        • Marengoni A.
        • Angleman S.
        • Melis R.
        • et al.
        Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature.
        Ageing Res Rev. 2011; 10: 430-439
        • Prados-Torres A.
        • Calderon-Larranaga A.
        • Hancco-Saavedra J.
        • Poblador-Plou B.
        • van den Akker M.
        Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 254-266
        • Barnett K.
        • Mercer S.W.
        • Norbury M.
        • Watt G.
        • Wyke S.
        • Guthrie B.
        Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 37-43
        • Rocca W.A.
        • Yawn B.P.
        • St Sauver J.L.
        • Grossardt B.R.
        • Melton III, L.J.
        History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87: 1202-1213
        • St Sauver J.L.
        • Grossardt B.R.
        • Yawn B.P.
        • Melton III, L.J.
        • Rocca W.A.
        Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173: 1059-1068
        • St Sauver J.L.
        • Grossardt B.R.
        • Yawn B.P.
        • et al.
        Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 41: 1614-1624
        • St Sauver J.L.
        • Grossardt B.R.
        • Leibson C.L.
        • Yawn B.P.
        • Melton III, L.J.
        • Rocca W.A.
        Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87: 151-160
        • Yawn B.P.
        • Yawn R.A.
        • Geier G.R.
        • Xia Z.
        • Jacobsen S.J.
        The impact of requiring patient authorization for use of data in medical records research.
        J Fam Pract. 1998; 47: 361-365
        • Jacobsen S.J.
        • Xia Z.
        • Campion M.E.
        • et al.
        Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 1999; 74: 330-338
        • Cohen J.W.
        • Cohen S.B.
        • Banthin J.S.
        The medical expenditure panel survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice.
        Med Care. 2009; 47: S44-S50
        • Porta M.S.
        • International Epidemiological Association
        A Dictionary of Epidemiology.
        5th ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY2008
        • Anderson D.W.
        • Mantel N.
        On epidemiologic surveys.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1983; 118: 613-619
        • Deming W.E.
        Boundaries of statistical inference.
        in: Smith H. Johnson N.L. New Developments in Survey Sampling. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY1969: 652-670
        • Rocca W.A.
        • Cha R.H.
        • Waring S.C.
        • Kokmen E.
        Incidence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a reanalysis of data from Rochester, Minnesota, 1975-1984.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 51-62
      1. US Census Bureau. US decennial census 2010. http://www.census.gov/2010census/data. Accessed June 16, 2014.

        • Rocca W.A.
        • Mielke M.M.
        • Vemuri P.
        • Miller V.M.
        Sex and gender differences in the causes of dementia: a narrative review.
        Maturitas. 2014; (In press)
        • IOM (Institute of Medicine)
        Women's Health Research: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise.
        The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2010
        • Piette J.D.
        • Kerr E.A.
        The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care.
        Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 725-731
        • Pentakota S.R.
        • Rajan M.
        • Fincke B.G.
        • et al.
        Does diabetes care differ by type of chronic comorbidity? an evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework.
        Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 1285-1292
        • Sharma A.
        • Einstein A.J.
        • Vallakati A.
        • et al.
        Risk of atrial fibrillation with use of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates.
        Am J Cardiol. 2014; 113: 1815-1821
        • Egede L.E.
        Major depression in individuals with chronic medical disorders: prevalence, correlates and association with health resource utilization, lost productivity and functional disability.
        Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007; 29: 409-416
        • Goodell S.
        • Druss B.G.
        • Reisinger Walker E.
        Mental disorders and medical comorbidity.
        in: The Synthesis Project. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ2011 (Policy Brief No. 21)
        • Katon W.J.
        Clinical and health services relationships between major depression, depressive symptoms, and general medical illness.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54: 216-226
        • Boyd C.
        • Leff B.
        • Weiss C.
        • Wolff J.
        • Hamblin A.
        • Martin L.
        Clarifying Multimorbidity to Improve Targeting and Delivery of Clinical Services for Medicaid Populations.
        Center for Health Care Strategies Inc, Hamilston, NJDecember 2010
        • Salisbury C.
        Multimorbidity: redesigning health care for people who use it.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 7-9
        • Wang F.
        • Xu S.
        • Shen X.
        • Guo X.
        • Shen R.
        Epidemiology of multimorbidity.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 1382-1383
        • Guthrie B.
        • Watt G.
        • Wyke S.
        • Mercer S.W.
        Epidemiology of multimorbidity: author's reply.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 1383
      2. Komisar HL, Feder J. Transforming care for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions and long-term care needs: coordinating care across all services. http://cahpf.org/docuserfiles/georgetown_trnsfrming_care.pdf. Published October 2011. Accessed June 16, 2014.

        • Leibson C.L.
        • Brown A.W.
        • Ransom J.E.
        • et al.
        Incidence of traumatic brain injury across the full disease spectrum: a population-based medical record review study.
        Epidemiology. 2011; 22: 836-844
        • Leibson C.L.
        • Naessens J.M.
        • Brown Jr., R.D.
        • Whisnant J.P.
        Accuracy of hospital discharge abstracts for identifying stroke.
        Stroke. 1994; 25: 2348-2355
        • Leibson C.L.
        • Needleman J.
        • Buerhaus P.
        • et al.
        Identifying in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE): a comparison of claims-based approaches with the Rochester Epidemiology Project VTE cohort.
        Med Care. 2008; 46: 127-132
        • Roger V.L.
        • Killian J.
        • Henkel M.
        • et al.
        Coronary disease surveillance in Olmsted County objectives and methodology.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 593-601
        • Yawn B.P.
        • Wollan P.
        • St Sauver J.
        Comparing shingles incidence and complication rates from medical record review and administrative database estimates: how close are they?.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174: 1054-1061