I can imagine a new textbook entitled The Prostate being published in every future decade to give us a state-of-the-art update. “What
is the prostate and what is it for?” begins this new entry into the urologic literature.
Readers will not find the answers to these questions in this volume. Perhaps only
the pineal of all the human “glands” is more poorly understood than the prostate.
Confusion seems to prevail over all aspects of the prostate, including the anatomy,
the physiology, and, in particular, the optimal treatment for localized adenocarcinoma—for
which the lack of a satisfactory randomized and prospective trial dooms the future
to the endless and meaningless debate that has marked the past.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Mayo Clinic ProceedingsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
REFERENCE
- The natural history of prostatic cancer.Cancer. 1973; 32: 1104-1112
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1986 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.