Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Initial Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Experience

      OBJECTIVE

      To review a single institution's experience with robotassisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

      PATIENTS AND METHODS

      We reviewed retrospectively all cholecystectomies performed with the assistance of a surgical robot at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz, from October 2002 to July 2003. Cholangiograms were obtained intraoperatively for patients with elevated results on liver function tests. The gallbladder was removed by the surgeon with the use of the robot. A surgical assistant at the operating table exchanged instruments in the robot arms and applied clips when needed. Total operating time, assembly time of the robot, complications, and postoperative course were evaluated.

      RESULTS

      Nineteen patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy; 16 had symptomatic cholelithiasis, 2 had gallbladder polyps, and 1 had acute cholecystitis. Of the 19 surgeries, 16 were completed successfully with robotic assistance. In 3 consecutive patients, a mechanical problem occurred with the robot; however, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean set-up time, including patient positioning and preparation and robotic installation, was 28.1 minutes. The mean ± SD operating time was 82.3±17.9 minutes without a cholangiogram and 102±20.9 minutes with a cholangiogram. There were no complications and no conversions to an open procedure.

      CONCLUSION

      Robotic surgery offers many potential advantages, including surgeon comfort, elimination of surgeon tremor, improved imaging, and increased degrees of freedom of the operative instruments, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, patient outcomes and operative costs need to be evaluated further.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Steiner CA
        • Bass EB
        • Talamini MA
        • Pitt HA
        • Steinberg EP
        Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 403-408
        • Darzi A
        • Mackay S
        Recent advances in minimal access surgery.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 31-34
        • Gadacz TR
        Update on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including a clinical pathway.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 80: 1127-1149
        • Ballantyne GH
        The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 1-5
        • Sackier JM
        • Wang Y
        Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery: from concept to development.
        Surg Endosc. 1994; 8: 63-66
        • Bann S
        • Khan M
        • Hernandez J
        • et al.
        Robotics in surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196: 784-795
      1. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. 11th ed. Merriam-Webster, Inc, Springfield, Mass2003: 1078
        • Jacobs S
        • Falk V
        Pearls and pitfalls: lessons learned in endoscopic robotic surgery—the da Vinci experience.
        Heart Surg Forum. 2001; 4: 307-310
        • Horgan S
        • Vanuno D
        Robots in laparoscopic surgery.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001; 11: 415-419
        • Cadiere GB
        • Himpens J
        • Germay O
        • et al.
        Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.
        World J Surg. 2001; 25: 1467-1477
        • Marescaux J
        • Smith MK
        • Folscher D
        • Jamali F
        • Malassagne B
        • Leroy J
        Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients.
        Ann Surg. 2001; 234: 1-7
        • Ruurda JP
        • Broeders IA
        • Simmermacher RP
        • Rinkes IH
        • Van Vroonhoven TJ
        Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 41-45
        • Kim VB
        • Chapman WH
        • Albrecht RJ
        • et al.
        Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 33-40
        • Spyt TJ
        • De Souza AC
        Minimally invasive therapy and robotics.
        Br Med Bull. 2001; 59: 261-268
        • Marescaux J
        • Leroy J
        • Rubino F
        • et al.
        Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 235: 487-492
        • Marescaux J
        • Leroy J
        • Gagner M
        • et al.
        Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery [published correction appears in Nature. 2001;414:710].
        Nature. 2001; 413: 379-380
        • Cleary K
        • Nguyen C
        State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges.
        Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6: 312-328
        • Jones JW
        • McCullough LB
        A surgeon's obligations when performing new procedures.
        J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35: 409-410
        • Boyd WD
        • Kiaii B
        • Novick RJ
        • et al.
        RAVECAB: improving outcome in off-pump minimal access surgery with robotic assistance and video enhancement.
        Can J Surg. 2001; 44: 45-50
        • Damiano Jr, RJ
        • Ducko CT
        • Stephenson Jr, ER
        • Lawton JS
        • Kuenzler RO
        • Chambers CE
        Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective single center clinical trial.
        J Card Surg. 2000; 15: 256-265
        • Damiano Jr, RJ
        • Tabaie HA
        • Mack MJ
        • et al.
        Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 1263-1268
        • Detter C
        • Boehm DH
        • Reichenspurner H
        • Deuse T
        • Arnold M
        • Reichart B
        Robotically-assisted coronary artery surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass—from first clinical use to endoscopic operation.
        Med Sci Monit. 2002; 8: MT118-MT123
        • Felger JE
        • Chitwood Jr, WR
        • Nifong LW
        • Holbert D
        Evolution of mitral valve surgery: toward a totally endoscopic approach.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 1203-1208
        • Kodera K
        • Kiaii B
        • Rayman R
        • Novick RJ
        • Boyd WD
        Closed chest CABG on the beating heart with a computer-enhanced articulating system: case report.
        Heart Surg Forum. 2001; 4: 305-306
        • Guillonneau B
        • Cappele O
        • Martinez JB
        • Navarra S
        • Vallancien G
        Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans.
        J Urol. 2001; 165: 1078-1081
        • Abbou CC
        • Hoznek A
        • Salomon L
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot.
        J Urol. 2001; 165: 1964-1966
        • Ruurda JP
        • Broeders IA
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis.
        Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 236-241
        • Reichenspurner H
        • Boehm DH
        • Gulbins H
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69: 1176-1181
        • Marescaux J
        • Rubino F
        Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery, and telerobotics.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2003; 4: 109-113
        • Micali S
        • Virgili G
        • Vannozzi E
        • et al.
        Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases.
        J Endourol. 2000; 14: 493-496
        • Rassweiler J
        • Binder J
        • Frede T
        Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future?.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2001; 11: 309-320
        • Link RE
        • Schulam PG
        • Kavoussi LR
        Telesurgery: remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 177-188
        • Talamini MA
        Surgery of the 21st century [editorial].
        Ann Surg. 2001; 234: 8-9