OBJECTIVE
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Mayo Clinic ProceedingsREFERENCES
- Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland2000
- Teaching evidence-based medicine to medical students.Med Teach. 2003; 25: 202-204
- Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula.Acad Med. 1999; 74: 686-694
- An integrated program for evidence-based medicine in medical school.Mt Sinai J Med. 2000; 67: 163-168
- Teaching emergency medicine residents evidence-based critical appraisal skills: a controlled trial.Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34: 148-154
- Teaching critical appraisal to medical students in obstetrics and gynecology.Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 877-882
- Early introduction of an evidence-based medicine course to preclinical medical students.J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 58-65
- Training medical students in evidence-based medicine: a community campus approach.Fam Med. 1999; 31: 703-708
- Educational programs in US medical schools, 2002-2003.JAMA. 2003; 290: 1190-1196
- Is that it? how online articles have changed over the past five years.BMJ. 2002; 325: 1475-1478
- The JCI's commitment to excellence—and free access.J Clin Invest. 2003; 112: 968-969
- Fact Sheet: MEDLINE.(Accessibility verified July 8, 2004.)
- Visibility of research: FUTON bias [letter].Lancet. 2002; 360: 1256
- ISI essay: the impact factor.Current Contents®. June 20, 1994; 25: 3-7
- Authors' criteria for selecting journals.JAMA. 1994; 272: 163-164
- Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality.Med J Aust. 2003; 178: 280-281
- The “omnipotent” Science Citation Index impact factor [editorial].Med J Aust. 2003; 178: 253-254
- A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction.JAMA. 1992; 268: 240-248
- The science of reviewing research.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993; 703: 125-133
- Computer use among community-based primary care physician preceptors.Acad Med. 2004; 79: 580-590
- Publication bias: a brief review for clinicians.Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75: 1284-1288
- Abstract! [editorial].Neth J Med. 2002; 60: 418
- Sprucing up one's impact factor [letter].Nature. 1999; 401: 321-322
- Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.BMJ. 1997; 314: 498-502
- Impact factors: uses and abuses.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 14: 209-211
- Journal impact factor: a brief review [editorial].CMAJ. 1999; 161: 979-980
- Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 2449-2454
- The Impact Factor: time for change.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001; 35: 563-568
- Online access to nephrology journals: the FUTON bias [letter].Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18: 1943
- Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?.JAMA. 1998; 279: 611-614
- Online access to nephrology journals: the FUTON bias [reply].Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18: 1943
Article Info
Footnotes
Presented in part at the following national and international meetings: Second International Conference of Evidence Based Health-Care Teachers and Developers, Palermo, Italy, September 12, 2003; 20th Midwest SGIM Regional Meeting, Chicago, Ill, September 20, 2003; American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals, Annual Scientific Meeting, Orlando, Fla, October 26, 2003; Annual Minnesota American College of Physicians Chapter Meeting, Minneapolis, Minn, November 7, 2003; and National American Society of Nephrology, San Diego, Calif, November 15, 2003.