Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Effect of “Ionized” Wrist Bracelets on Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

      Objective

      To assess objectively the perceived benefits of wearing an “ionized” wrist bracelet to treat muscle or joint pain.

      Subjects and Methods

      This study was performed at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla, in 2000 and 2001. In a randomized, double-blind design, 305 participants wore an ionized bracelet and 305 wore a placebo bracelet for 4 weeks. For each location where pain was present at baseline, participants rated the intensity of pain. Follow-up ratings were made after 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of wearing the bracelet. Two primary end points were defined for evaluating efficacy. The first was the change at 4-week follow-up (day 28) in the pain score at the location with the highest baseline value (maximum pain score). The second was the change at 4-week follow-up in the sum of the pain scores for all locations.

      Results

      Analysis of the data showed significant improvement in pain scores in both groups, but no differences were observed between the group wearing the placebo bracelet and the group wearing the ionized bracelet.

      Conclusion

      The finding that subjective improvement in pain scores was equivalent with ionized and placebo bracelet use questions the benefit of using an ionized bracelet. New treatments in alternative medical therapy must be shown to be effective through vigorous, unbiased, objective testing before physicians acknowledge potential benefits or recommend these treatments to patients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Eskinazi DP
        Factors that shape alternative medicine.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1621-1623
      1. Enhancing Accountability of Alternative Medicine. Milbank Memorial Fund, New York, NY1998
        • Eisenberg DM
        • Davis RB
        • Ettner SL
        • et al.
        Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1569-1575
        • Rao JK
        • Mihaliak K
        • Kroenke K
        • Bradley J
        • Tierney WM
        • Weinberger M
        Use of complementary therapies for arthritis among patients of rheumatologists.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131: 409-416
        • Sugerman J
        • Burk L
        Physicians' ethical obligations regarding alternative medicine.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1623-1625
      2. The Q-Ray.
        (Accessibility verified August 2, 2002.)
        • Hróbjartsson A
        • Gøtzsche PC
        Is the placebo powerless? an analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1594-1602
        • Kaptchuk TJ
        The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance?.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 817-825