Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home
MCP Digital Health Home

Participation Bias Assessment in a Community-Based Study of Myocardial Infarction, 2002-2005

      OBJECTIVE

      To compare the characteristics and survival of participants and nonparticipants in a community-based study of myocardial infarction (MI).

      PATIENTS AND METHODS

      Residents of Olmsted County, MN, who presented with elevated cardiac troponin T levels from September 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005, were prospectively enrolled and classified with standardized criteria for MI. With specific Institutional Review Board approval, the medical records of patients with MI who did not provide consent but who had given general research authorization were reviewed, as was done for their consenting peers.

      RESULTS

      During the study period, 2277 individuals with elevated cardiac troponin T levels were approached, of whom 1863 (82%) consented to participate. Among the 414 nonparticipants, 375 (91%) had general research authorization. Of the 558 with general research authorization who met the criteria for incident (ie, first-ever) MI, 67 (12%) refused to participate. These participants tended to be older (mean ± SD age, 71±14 vs 67±15 years; P=.04), were more likely to be of races other than white (9% vs 2%; P=.01), and had more comorbidities, including peripheral vascular disease (P=.02), chronic pulmonary disease (P=.06), heart failure (P=.07), and impaired creatinine clearance (P=.02). No significant differences were detected in cardiovascular risk factors or MI characteristics. During a median follow-up of 517 days, nonparticipants experienced increased mortality rates compared with participants (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.20), which was largely attributable to their older age and excess comorbidities (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.35).

      CONCLUSION

      In this community-based study of MI, nonparticipants experienced worse survival rates than participants largely because of differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. These differences should be kept in mind when interpreting study results, particularly if participation is low.
      CI (confidence interval), HR (hazard ratio), MI (myocardial infarction)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Rothman KJ
        • Greenland S
        Precision and validity in epidemiologic studies.
        in: Rothman KJ Greenland S Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA1998: 115-134
        • Olson SH
        • Voigt LF
        • Begg CB
        • Weiss NS
        Reporting participation in case-control studies.
        Epidemiology. 2002; 13: 123-126
        • Sandler DP
        On revealing what we'd rather hide: the problem of describing study participation [editorial].
        Epidemiology. 2002; 13: 117
        • Pocock SJ
        • Collier TJ
        • Dandreo KJ
        • et al.
        Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice.
        BMJ. 2004 Oct 16; 329 (Epub 2004 Oct 6.): 883-887
        • Greenland S
        Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1977; 106: 184-187
        • Morton LM
        • Cahill J
        • Hartge P
        Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb 1; 163 (Epub 2005 Dec 7.): 197-203
        • Adams MM
        • Scherr PA
        • Branch LG
        • et al.
        A comparison of elderly participants in a community survey with nonparticipants.
        Public Health Rep. 1990; 105: 617-622
        • Jousilahti P
        • Salomaa V
        • Kuulasmaa K
        • Niemela M
        • Vartiainen E
        Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59: 310-315
        • Jacobsen SJ
        • Mahoney DW
        • Redfield MM
        • Bailey KR
        • Burnett Jr, JC
        • Rodeheffer RJ
        Participation bias in a population-based echocardiography study.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2004; 14: 579-584
        • Ramos E
        • Lopes C
        • Barros H
        Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case-control study on myocardial infarction.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2004; 14: 437-441
        • Jacomb PA
        • Jorm AF
        • Korten AE
        • Christensen H
        • Henderson AS
        Predictors of refusal to participate: a longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia.
        BMC Public Health. 2002; 2 (Epub 2002 Mar 13.): 4-9
        • Vestbo J
        • Rasmussen FV
        Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of non-response bias follow up studies.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992; 46: 617-619
        • Boshuizen HC
        • Viet AL
        • Picavet HS
        • Botterweck A
        • van Loon AJ
        Nonresponse in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases.
        Public Health. 2006 Apr; 120 (Epub 2005 Dec 20.): 297-308
        • Criqui MH
        • Barrett-Connor E
        • Austin M
        Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1978; 108: 367-372
        • Eagan TM
        • Eide GE
        • Gulsvik A
        • Bakke PS
        Nonresponse in a community cohort study: predictors and consequences for exposure-disease associations.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 775-781
        • Moorman PG
        • Newman B
        • Millikan RC
        • Tse CK
        • Sandler DP
        Participation rates in a case-control study: the impact of age, race, and race of interviewer.
        Ann Epidemiol. 1999; 9: 188-195
        • Kurland LT
        • Elveback LR
        • Nobrega FT
        Population studies in Rochester and Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1900-1968.
        in: Kessler I Levin ML The Community as an Epidemiologic Laboratory: A Casebook of Community Studies. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD1970: 47-70
        • Melton III, LJ
        History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 1996; 71: 266-274
        • Roger VL
        • Killian JM
        • Weston SA
        • et al.
        Redefinition of myocardial infarction: prospective evaluation in the community.
        Circulation. 2006 Aug 22; 114 (Epub 2006 Aug 14.): 790-797
        • Apple FS
        • Wu AH
        • Jaffe AS
        European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials.
        Am Heart J. 2002; 144: 981-986
        • Luepker RV
        • Apple FS
        • Christenson RH
        • et al.
        Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
        Circulation. 2003 Nov 18; 108 (Epub 2003 Nov 10.): 2543-2549
        • Roger VL
        • Killian J
        • Henkel M
        • et al.
        Coronary disease surveillance in Olmsted County objectives and methodology.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 593-601
        • Doll R
        • Hill AB
        Mortality in relation to smoking: ten years' observations of British doctors.
        Br Med J. 1964; 1: 1399-1410
        • Gordon T
        • Moore FE
        • Shurtleff D
        • Dawber TR
        Some methodologic problems in the long-term study of cardiovascular disease: observations on the Framingham Study.
        J Chronic Dis. 1959; 10: 186-206
        • Kannel WB
        • Feinleib M
        • McNamara PM
        • Garrison RJ
        • Castelli WP
        An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: the Framingham offspring study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1979; 110: 281-290
        • Luepker RV
        • Arnett DK
        • Jacobs Jr, DR
        • et al.
        Trends in blood pressure, hypertension control, and stroke mortality: the Minnesota Heart Survey.
        Am J Med. 2006; 119: 42-49
        • Nelson JJ
        • Liao D
        • Sharrett AR
        • et al.
        Serum albumin level as a predictor of incident coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 468-477
        • Bursi F
        • Weston SA
        • Redfield MM
        • et al.
        Systolic and diastolic heart failure in the community.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 2209-2216
        • Burke JP
        • Rhodes T
        • Jacobson DJ
        • et al.
        Association of anthropometric measures with the presence and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jul 1; 164 (Epub 2006 Apr 12.): 41-46
        • Delgado-Aros S
        • Locke III, GR
        • Camilleri M
        • et al.
        Obesity is associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal symptoms: a population-based study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 1801-1806
        • Rule AD
        • Rodeheffer RJ
        • Larson TS
        • et al.
        Limitations of estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine in the general population [published correction appears in Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1639].
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81: 1427-1434
        • Benfante R
        • Reed D
        • MacLean C
        • Kagan A
        Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 130: 1088-1100
        • Pirzada A
        • Yan LL
        • Garside DB
        • Schiffer L
        • Dyer AR
        • Daviglus ML
        Response rates to a questionnaire 26 years after baseline examination with minimal interim participant contact and baseline differences between respondents and nonrespondents.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 94-101
        • Bisgard KM
        • Folsom AR
        • Hong CP
        • Sellers TA
        Mortality and cancer rates in nonrespondents to a prospective study of older women: 5-year follow-up.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 990-1000
        • Moorman PG
        • Skinner CS
        • Evans JP
        • et al.
        Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 1349-1354
        • Jha P
        • Deboer D
        • Sykora K
        • Naylor CD
        Characteristics and mortality outcomes of thrombolysis trial participants and nonparticipants: a population-based comparison.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1335-1342
        • Corbie-Smith G
        • Thomas SB
        • St George DM
        Distrust, race, and research.
        Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 2458-2463
        • Harris Y
        • Gorelick PB
        • Samuels P
        • Bempong I
        Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 1996; 88: 630-634