Advertisement
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Home

Clinician Attitudes Toward Biostatistics

      OBJECTIVE

      To assess clinician attitudes toward biostatistics at an academic medical center.

      PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

      We conducted a cross-sectional survey of medical students, internal medicine resident physicians, and internal medicine teaching faculty at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, MN, in April 2005.

      RESULTS

      Of 468 eligible participants, 301 (64.3%) responded to the survey. A total of 87.3% of respondents (262/300) believed it would benefit their career to better understand biostatistics, but only 17.6% (53/301) believed their training in biostatistics was adequate for their needs. A total of 23.3% of respondents (70/ 300) agreed they could identify when correct statistical methods had been applied in a study, 28.0% (84/300) agreed they could design their own research projects with confidence, and 14.6% (44/301) agreed they could conduct their own statistical analyses with confidence. Respondents with the highest self-reported level of statistical education and research experience were more likely to report these skills (all, P<.001). A total of 92.7% of respondents (279/301) believed biostatistics is an important part of evidence-based medicine (EBM), and 88.0% (265/301) believed EBM is important for clinical practice. However, biostatistics was not evaluated as being as important as many other areas of study within medicine.

      CONCLUSION

      Clinicians across levels of training have low perceived knowledge of biostatistical concepts despite a clear recognition of the importance of these issues. An integrated approach to teaching biostatistics that merges biostatistics with clinically relevant medical discussions, such as those that occur in many EBM curricula for epidemiological principles, may promote learning of biostatistics.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. Evidence-Based Medical Working Group Guyatt G Rennie D Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. AMA Press, Chicago, IL2002
        • Berwick DM
        • Fineberg HV
        • Weinstein MC
        When doctors meet numbers.
        Am J Med. 1981; 71: 991-998
        • Reznick RK
        • Dawson-Saunders E
        • Folse JR
        A rationale for the teaching of statistics to surgical residents.
        Surgery. 1987; 101: 611-617
        • Wulff HR
        • Andersen B
        • Brandenhoff P
        • Guttler F
        What do doctors know about statistics?.
        Stat Med. 1987; 6: 3-10
        • Altman DG
        • Bland JM
        Improving doctors' understanding of statistics.
        J R Stat Soc [A]. 1991; 154: 223-267
        • O'Donnell CA
        Attitudes and knowledge of primary care professionals towards evidence-based practice: a postal survey.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2004; 10: 197-205
        • Altman DG
        Statistical reviewing for medical journals.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 2661-2674
        • Morris RW
        Does EBM offer the best opportunity yet for teaching medical statistics?.
        Stat Med. 2002; 21: 969-977
        • Shah SI
        Viewpoint: pancakes and medical statistics.
        Acad Med. 2005; 80: 452-454
        • Wise SL
        The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1985; 45: 401-405
        • Schau C
        • Stevens J
        • Dauphinee TL
        • Del Vecchio A
        The development and validation of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1995; 55: 868-875
        • Murray GD
        How we should approach the future.
        Stat Med. 1990; 9: 1063-1068
        • Cheatham ML
        A structured curriculum for improved resident education in statistics.
        Am Surg. 2000; 66: 585-588
        • Swift G
        • Crotty F
        • Moran M
        • McDonough CM
        • Moran A
        • Casey PR
        Inviting a statistician to join an evidence-based journal club.
        Psychol Bull. 2001; 25: 397-399
        • Astin J
        • Jenkins T
        • Moore L
        Medical students' perspective on the teaching of medical statistics in the undergraduate medical curriculum.
        Stat Med. 2002; 21: 1003-1006
        • Marantz PR
        • Burton W
        • Steiner-Grossman P
        Using the case-discussion method to teach epidemiology and biostatistics.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: 365-371
        • Appleton DR
        What statistics should we teach medical undergraduates and graduates?.
        Stat Med. 1990; 9: 1013-1021
        • Green ML
        Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula.
        Acad Med. 1999; 74: 686-694
        • Sackett DL
        • Richardson WS
        • Rosenberg W
        • Haynes RB
        Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1998