REFERENCES
Schloendorff v the Society of the New York Hospital, 211 NY 125 105 NE 92 1914 LEXIS 1028 (1914).
Grable & Sons Metal Products v Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 125 S Ct 2363 2370 (2005).
- Informed consent does not mean rational consent: cognitive limitations on decision-making.J Leg Med. 1990; 11: 321-350
- Probing the question of technology-induced risk.IEEE Spectrum. 1981; 18: 58-64
- Kahneman D Slovic P Tversky A Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK1982: 3350-3360
Jackson v Julian, 694 SW 2d 434 (Tex App -Dallas 1985)
Walstad v University of Minnesota Hospital, 442 F2d 634 (8th Cir 1971)
Ditto v McCurdy, 510 F3d 1070, 1078 (9th Cir 2007)
Baylor Medical University Medical Center v Biggs, 237 SW3d 909, 922 (Tex App 2007)
Hill v Medlantic Health Care Group, 933 A 2d 314, 330 (DC App 2007)
Miller-McGee v Washington Hospital Center, 920 A2d 430, 439 (DC App 2007)
Gorney v Meaney, 150 P2d 799, 804 (Az App Div 2 2007)
Kuperstein v Hoffman-Laroche, Inc, 457 F Supp 472, 473 (SD NY 2006)
Ardoin v McKay, 939 So2d 698, 705 (La App 3d Cir 2006)
Saks v Ng, 890 A2d 983, 992-993 (NJ App 2006)
Sherwood v Carter, 805 P2d 452, 463 (Idaho 1991)
Gassman v United States, 589 F Supp 1534, 1545 (MD Fla 1984)
- Keeton WP Prosser WL Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th ed. West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN1984
Madare v Ochsner Foundation Hospital, 505 So 2d 146 (La Ct App 1987)
Canterbury v Spence, 464 F2d 772 (CADC 1972)
Cowman v Hornaday, 329 NW 2d 422 (Iowa 1983)
- The “exceptions” to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decision making.Wis L Rev. 1979; 1979: 413-488
Banks v Wittenberg, 266 NW 2d 788 82 Mich App 274 (Mich App 1978)
- Crisis and informed consent: analysis of a law-medicine malocclusion.Am J Law Med. 1987; 12: 55-97
Shafford v Louisiana State University, 448 So 2d 852 (La Ct App 1984)
Kissinger v Lofgren, 836 F 2d 678 (CA 1 [Mass] 1987)
- Strict liability and informed consent: “Don't say I didn't tell you so!”.Akron Law Rev. 1976 Spring; 9: 609-628
- Malpractice: toward a viable decision standard for informed consent.Oklahoma Law Rev. 1979 Fall; 32: 868-890
Cobbs v Grant, 8 Cal 3d 229 502 P2d 1 (Cal 1972)
Moore v Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal 3d D20 165 793. P 2d 479 291 Cal Rptr 147 note 41 (1990).
- Informed consent and the scope of a physician's duty to disclose.N D Law Rev. 2001; 77: 71
Demers v Gerety, 85 NM 641 515 P 2d 645 (1972).
Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Decision-making capacity. Minn Stat 145C 01 subd 1b
Karp v Cooley, 349 F Supp 827 (SD Tex 1972) aff'd 493 F2d 408 (5th Cir 1974) cert denied 419 US 845 (1974).
Parikh v Cunningham, 493 So 2d 999 11 FL L. Weekly 309 (Fla, 1986)
Tarasoff v Regents of U of California, 131 Cal Rptr 24 20 551 P2d 334 340 (1976).
- Control of tuberculosis—the law and the public's health.N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 585-588
FHarper T, James. The Law of Torts (1968 Supp.) sec 17.161; 1968.
Rogers v TJ Samson Community Hospital, 276 F 3d 228 (6 Cir 2002)
- Obtaining informed consent from patients in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: physicians' experiences and attitudes [letter].Heart. 2004; 90: 208-210
- Patient comprehension and reaction to participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial (ISIS-4) in acute myocardial infarction.Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 1142-1146
- Informed consent in trials for neurological emergencies: the example of subarachnoid haemorrhage.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003; 74: 988-991
- The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Ecco, New York, NY2004
Article Info
Footnotes
For editorial comment, see page 272
